design

A critical analysis of the Aadhaar Logo

Posted by kshitiz on May 02, 2010
Graphic Design, articles, critique, design / 2 Comments

In one of my earlier posts, I had written about analyzing logos by using Semiotic Theory. What it basically was to take a closer understanding through different point of views related to the viewer, the designer, etc. Of late one notices that even the governments have been interested in getting their logos designed, and seeking inputs from designers. It is a healthy sign indeed. One such example is the Government of India working hard on the Unique Identification Project under the name of Unique Identification Authority of India and headed by former Infosys co-founder, Nandan Nilekani.

Nandan Nilekani launching the new logo and name

Nandan Nilekani launching the new logo and name

They recently had a new name (Aadhaar) to the whole project and a new logo unveiled.

I am going to do a critical analysis of this logo based on the semiotic theory and seeking the explanations from the phenomenological understanding that I have developed over the years of designing logos and branding solutions.

To start with, when trying to understand the semiotics behind the logo, one first has to understand the referential function i.e. the content of what the logo is composed. The Aadhaar logo is primarily composed of three parts namely, the sun and the finger print and the text below the logo. There are two prime signs in the logo in terms of the imagery. These signs signify certain attributes independently and then as a collective they have a different meaning. While doing a critical analysis, it is important that we understand the signified meaning of all the individual signs and what they signify and then finally the overall logo.

Being an Indian, I understand that the association with the Sun is perhaps more than any celestial body out there. The sun is an element that is worshiped across the country and hold an important cultural significance in the state of things here. Metaphorically a sun would signify brightness, progress, sunshine and the ray of hope in a dark world. At the back of the mind one is also thinking progress and the development of the masses. The aim of the project is indeed to do that. Things like getting identity, removing irregularities in ration cards, and other loan procedures, for the primarily rural audience is a big goal of this project.

The number 7 again holds an important status in the Hindu Mythology, and that could be an explanation for the seven rays of the sun. The shape of the says of the sun has a motif that is inspired from the lotus petals and that too has some significance in the Hindu mythology. Based on these points, one may get the impression that it is a non-secular logo, but looking at the universality of the sun, it is best to assume secularity in the logo.

One of the key aspects when looking at the logo is the sender-receiver relation. The sender in this case is the government of India, who owns the project, and the receiver of the information (and the meaning) is the public and the citizens of the country.  You want a logo that is easy to identify, and hence the sun and the finger prints have been used. Both of them are easy to identify with the audience (which is an Indian audience) that we are looking at.

However notice that at some point of time the finger print actually morphed itself graphically into patterns. he abstraction leads to it becoming a pattern instead of just a finger print. This is good, as the project uses not only finger prints; but also iris patterns, and therefore a graphic representation of the pattern was required.

The presence of the similar names (do a Google search on Aadhaar and see the results you get) , as compared to a totally new word (which would have come about if UADAI was used to create the logo) could create some confusion in the initial days, but it will be overcome by the mass usage of Aadhaar for this project. The choice of the name is smart, as the word can be found across languages and is easy to connect with a larger pool of people. Having its root in the Sanskrit language definitely has a wider reach, but still misses out on a few pockets.

I am not to impressed with the choice of colors here. The red and yellow gives it a communist feel to it and could lead to some controversies. Would love to see more of the India blue, or the usage of the saffron in the logos. The red being so dominant a color, the yellow / orange is totally overshadowed and its only when you come near to the logo that you notice the sun’s halo.

Overall, I feel there could have been a better design, but I think to start off with this is a good choice. Once the project is up and running and the word Aadhaar is on everyone’s talk, there can always be a redesign of it. I congratulate the designer of the logo and the government for working on this project and valuing designers!

Cheers!

State of UX in India

Posted by kshitiz on February 15, 2010
HCI, Interaction Design, design / No Comments

I recently came across this article by Joe Fletcher titled “The Bridge Between Cultures and Design”
The synopsis of the article is that:
Over roughly the last 10 years, China and India have given way to a huge rise in technology outsourcing. Jobs are outsourced from companies like Microsoft, Google, T-Mobile, Honeywell, and many others. In Microsoft I’ve worked with teams in both India and China developing software for a variety of uses. Having our headquarters in the US, I usually work with small satellite teams in these countries. I couldn’t help but wonder why these countries who had become huge in the area of software technology, struggled so much in the area of user experience and UI innovation.Note: this article refers specifically to software UX. Both of these countries have very innovative and creative aspects in other areas of their culture, and I’m not expressing these comments as blanket statements.

I think that is a very valid question that Joe puts across. However I do not quite agree to all the points that he mentions in the article especially if one is looking at the case of India.

Cross Cultural Design

Cross Cultural Design

One of the key things required to see is the growth of UX as a field in India. While in the west the field UX, Interaction Design, HCI have been around for much longer a time, in India it is know only for say last 5-6 years.

This leads us the point that in India, Interaction Design has a long way to go before it catches up on the west. In my opinion, in India, the Interaction Design as a field is still limited to the software industry and all the User Experience is still discussed in the context of the Software Design. Unless the understanding of Interaction Design, expands beyond the UI,  and people understand Interaction Design from a more broader perspective, there is bound to be this case as expressed above.

Also Interaction Design as a discipline in the academics has only been offered only lately in the design schools. The study of HCI and USability is still very limited. Most of the professionals practicing in the IxD field in India are either graduates in Product Design or Visual Communication. A lot of the professionals thus have been in the field by virtue of their self learnings.However that is changing, with Interaction Design and related studies being offered at numerous schools in India and a keen interest by professionals to follow the subject. Some of the schools doing that are offering course in HCI are the National Institute of Design, Industrial Design Centre (IIT Bombay), IIT Guwahati to name a few.

Thirdly, there has to be more freedom given to the ‘design’ teams sitting in the off shore location (read India), in order to allow to innovate. It is my belief that only when the design starts from the initial stage, there is a scope for innovation and creativity. Creativity is hampered when things are already created. So having the design team sitting in the off shore location, start to innovate when all the requirements and the information architecture is frozen, is difficult. It’s not impossible, but the scope gets reduced and there is only a limit to what one can do at that stage.

Lastly, the design industry or people in the software industry who do design, should interact more with people in the colleges, and illustrate what it takes to innovate and get creativity at the job level where its much more competitive and challenging. We at Deskala, have been doing so through our Design Workshops in HCI, Design Thinking, Usability, Experience Design at corporate houses and various colleges, and the results have been giving us a lot of hope more than anything else!

An Inspiration: Interview with Paul Rand

Posted by kshitiz on November 28, 2009
Graphic Design, design, talks / No Comments

Came across this interesting interview about the legendary graphic designer Paul Rand. Touched upon some really nice points. Gives an explanation on the IBM logo, and also his views on why the world needs graphic designers in it.
Enjoy!

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3